Well the article didn't really get into what I wanted to read about, I was hoping to comment "Finally someone in this country addresses the outdated term "indie" as its applied to the music industry." I guess we'll leave that up to the experts to handle. Still a great piece, basically discussing how small a market the canadian music industry is, and the clash between media, the public, the prize, and the musicians. still unclear as to why the word indie is in the title like three times but the idea is never truly properly explained or developed in this piece.
How many times do we have to read about canadian bands doing better in other countries? That's like writing, well the US won more medals than we did again at the Olympics. We're a smaller country, so obviously we're going to sell less.
N
though i have to say the beginning does disect the concept of indie music quite well, i guess i just got lost in the description of the polaris award show with sarah from much music, etc. it sounded like a terrible money meets art sleeper hold moment in time.
i change my mind, i actually like this piece. i just wish someone would destroy the word indie forever from the media landscape.
but you do a good job of describing how indie is not a suitable term anymore for a lot of these so called independent labels.
this is what happens when i don't drink coffeee in the morning.
peace
ngm
For every one valid and worthwhile statement that she presents, there are two errors in either judgement or fact. I have to say I think her pretensions got the best of her in this article. It’s sad because half the article belongs in The Walrus, and the other belongs in a zine. She nitpicks aesthetics, which undercut her article; makes you question her bias. Biting journalism should be tempered, which is why I don't understand the passive aggresive references to clothes and hair.
For every good point she makes (and there are many) I think the article comes off as a well-researched statement to align herself with a kind of credibility that floats beyond any minimal prestige or degradation that she endows in this article.
the prize claims to be about all genres. but it can't ever be. how did you miss this point?
its a collusion of industry and grants and the boring cbc.
dozens of canadians rule the electronic and avant garde international scenes, but you'd never know it at the polaris.
You wouldn't happen to be white, middle-class, and from Toronto, would you?
I know Polaris jurors who I wouldn't trust to give me an off-hand recommendation. As music editor of a mid-sized alt weekly, I was offered a jury spot a few years ago, and turned it down because I didn't feel I'd heard a wide enough cross section of Canadian music that year. I think the problem with the prize is that the jury pool is too narrow —or maybe, too broad. You can be a well-known music writer in Canada simply by starting a blog and/or being reliable with deadlines and working hard. Doesn't mean you're qualified to judge the best albums of the year.
There are some seasoned critics on the list who've been around the block a few times, but there are also a lot of 20-25 year-old bloggers and freelancers whose musical memory doesn't extend before 2006 or so, and who basically pick a lot of inoffensive, artful but not tremendously exciting indie-folkie singer/songwriter material. Which is fine, but the list is top-heavy with that stuff. It's all rock/pop, and more than that it's mostly the same strain of rock/pop.
Interesting that a grand jury picked Fucked Up. A lot of people I know were dismayed when that band won (I was thrilled!). There were some great records competing with Chemistry of Common Life, but they were mostly good, solid entries in the catalogs of good, solid artists. Fucked Up recorded a triumph, on the other hand, and deserved the recognition.
I find it ironic that, of all of the art forms, perhaps only music penalizes you financially as you become more successful. You have considerable production costs, you have to in essence maintain two homes, (one often being a van that flits you across the country), and unless you become that 1% you will never be as financially secure as if you had just stayed home and worked fulltime at McDonalds. Frankly, the love must be strong.
Isn't the headline disingenuous? What does it really have to do with the article itself? And more so, did Jordan / Polaris actually state that its objective is to herald "indie" music? That isn't clearly stated in the article. I thought Polaris simply wanted to honour the "best" releases in Canada, and if that results in a list of 10 titles from the majors, so be it, and if it results in a list of 10 titles from independent labels, so be it. And the result, which is to be expected, is a mix of the two — so you get a list that features Warner's Tegan and Sara and Merge Records' Caribou. And for most of the artists, well it's arguable where you'd want to pigeonhole them — Shad gets Universal's support, BSS gets EMI's support, etc. — which indicates that perhaps the best thing is to simply not try to pigeonhole them by claiming they all claim to be "indie". And it's a shame to think that someone was bored stiff last year by 10 of Canada's most interesting musical acts.
Best that Alexandra not bother attending this year; there are many other people who'd be thrilled to have the opportunity to take her seat.
The only thing that the Polaris achieves is to provide employment for Jordan and his office, with a large chunk of it paid for by Factor, and other publically and privately funded grant entities.
It is nepotism of the highest order, and reeks of the same self-serving old-boys-club style of backslapping that makes the Junos a national embarrassment.
The music media are complicit in this massive fraud. These people should be ashamed of themselves.
We have amazingly great music in this country, all over the place, in styles and genres that you can't imagine, but these organizations make sure you will never hear any of it. Their focus is pathetically narrow, exclusive and self-serving.
This article would have served better to address and discuss the massive amount of abuse and fraud that occurs within these funding entities, and further, how the very organizations discussed in this article manipulate those entities to secure and enhance their bottom lines.
Hahaha,
"music ... in styles and genres that you can't imagine." What a statement. Awards for music are a popular medium by their very nature! Awards ceremonies are antithetical to ideals of experimental music, no matter what principles the Polaris does or does not stand for. "Indie" is a marketing term now, which is why the writer couldn't pull together a tangible statement in the first place. If you want to celebrate avant-garde music, there are these new things called blogs. They even have year-end lists, which fill that blank space that you're blindly whining over.
I'm not even standing up for the Polaris, it just seems that people like you love to play the martyr. It's subversive to rave about the evils of Canadian music! Who cares about context! That's become just as tacky as *Canadiana.
As for you, Serpico Wigand, go record in your bedroom or something.
*BSS, Dan Mangan, The Sadies.
Hahaha,
"music ... in styles and genres that you can't imagine." What a statement. Awards for music are a popular medium by their very nature! Awards ceremonies are antithetical to ideals of experimental music, no matter what principles the Polaris does or does not stand for. "Indie" is a marketing term now, which is why the writer couldn't pull together a tangible statement in the first place. If you want to celebrate avant-garde music, there are these new things called blogs. They even have year-end lists, which fill that blank space that you're blindly whining over.
I'm not even standing up for the Polaris, it just seems that people like you love to play the martyr. It's subversive to rave about the evils of Canadian music! Who cares about context! That's become just as tacky as *Canadiana.
As for you, Serpico Wigand, go record in your bedroom or something.
*BSS, Dan Mangan, The Sadies.
The term indie is just used to sell records these days, there is no true meaning. Obviously the majority of the finalists are not "independent" and use major label support.
Its sort of like starting a magazine, calling it a "non profit organization" with "charity status" but injecting it with an initial $2,000,000 start up fund, but still asking folks to donate to it, making charity videos with margaret atwood.....
we all think its a "non profit/indie" magazine, but its all using daddy's big wallet support.
I declare cultural jihad on awards industries and the laughable corruptions they foster
The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone
12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto
The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?
6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary